[public]
(owned by melsalm)
Stylistic Differences (89 items)
Last updated: over 10 years ago
To Do (27 left)
-
Is there an introduction section?
-
Is there a methods section?
-
Are there discrete sections at all?
-
Does author use citations?
-
Does author cite in-text?
-
Does author follow up citations with interpretation?
-
Does author vary throughout paper in citing practices?
-
Does author cite foot notes?
-
Does author type out title of book referenced?
-
Does author accompany text with visual aids?
-
Does author title visual aids?
-
Does author provide name on first page of text?
-
Does author use specific fonts for subject headings?
-
Is author's institution provided on first page of text?
-
Does author use special font for title?
-
Is the document centered?
-
Is the document 'adjusted'?
-
Is the document designed/presented to be read (dist: heard)?
-
Does author switch tenses?
-
Does author speak predominately in present tense?
-
Does author switch to past tense when speaking about fieldwork and/or written texts?
-
1st person narrative voice?
-
2nd person narrative voice?
-
Jargon-y?
-
Are cited theorists introduced by full name?
-
Are cited theorists introduced by last name?
-
Are cited theorists introduced along with brief bio?
-
Are informants/respondents/interlocuters quoted?
-
Are informants named?
-
Are informants included in article at all?
-
Is theory provided?
-
Are quotes used?
-
Are quotes prefaced?
-
Does author follow up quotations with critique?
-
Does author use metaphor?
-
Analogy?
-
Idioms?
-
Put things in "quotations" not to quote, but to designate appropriation of terminology?
-
Does author use ALL CAPS?
-
Italicize text for emphasizing importance?
-
Indent block quotes?
-
Does author create a list of bullet points?
-
Does author create a list of themes?
-
Does author enumerate points?
-
Does author cite their own previous work?
-
Does author refer to their own previous work?
-
Does author switch from 3rd to 1st person before halfway point in paper?
-
Does author switch from 3rd to 1st person after halfway point in paper?
-
Does author switch perspectives at all?
-
Does author speak in the name of a discipline?
-
Is there use of superscripts?
-
Is there a Notes section?
-
Is there a References section?
-
Is there a Recap?
-
Is there a meta-text?
-
Mention of students?
-
Mention of teaching (distinct from research)?
-
Is there critique?
-
Are there noticible buzzwords or catch phrases?
-
Does author make puns?
-
Does author ask rhetorical questions?
-
Can I detect sense of humor in writing?
-
Is the paper moody?
-
Are there moments of irony, or hints of ironic tones?
-
Does author ask rhetorical questions and then attempt to answer them?
-
Does author provide multiple examples to illustrate a point?
-
Does author provide experience to demonstrate a point?
-
Speak in maxims?
-
Use short sentences to make clear points?
-
Does author proliferate a series of questions at the end of a paragraph?
-
Propose direction of future research?
-
Use (parentheses) often?
-
Does author make up their own words or concepts?
-
Provide definitions?
-
Do etymological research?
-
Make a call to arms? (i.e. "We need... )
-
Does the paper do what it says it does?
-
Is paper performative?
-
Does author cite their credentials in the text?
-
Does author give thanks to colleagues in paper?
-
Does author ever mention friends?
-
Work with numbers?
-
Conclude with a question?
-
Conclude by adressing the introduction?
-
Conclude with a judgment?
-
Conclude with critique?
-
Is this article officially published?
-
Is this essay intended to circulate on its own?
-
Is this essay part of a larger text?